In a general note, I think it would have been easier to have read the second chapter of Digital Libraries by Arms first, followed by "Interoperability for Digital Objects and Repositories." "A Framework for Building Open Digital Libraries"could have been next, leaving "An Architecture for Information in Digital Libraries" for last. This is because the writing styles and terminology of the readings as listed in Blackboard begins very technically and finishes more simply. It was a bit disheartening to be thrown into the more complex articles first.
I sensed a bit of a theme among this week's readings. While the Arms chapter focused on the basics of the Internet and its use for digital libraries, the other articles heavily discussed interoperability and extensibility. With all of them being over tens years old, I have to wonder how much the arguments and experiments recounted actually impacted the modern reality. I could piece together a few examples from my experiences, but certainly not enough to truly make a judgement.
One theory that stood out to me was, in the Suleman and Fox article, the assertion that components were the future of digital libraries. I think one could confirm that this idea has not only shown up in modern digital libraries, but in all sorts of web applications. From the library standpoint, Omeka is a platform that I am somewhat familiar with and it is made up of a basic package and many optional component pieces. Selections include component pieces for patron submissions of material, various metadata standards, and PDF searchability.
Other websites and software packages, especially those classified as social media, allow users to attach add-ons to their personal accounts in order to customize their experience. Tumblr, Twitter, and several web browsers permit this. Therefore, Suleman and Fox's prediction has, in fact, become reality. I would be very interested to see what other statements had been proven or disproven from these readings.
No comments:
Post a Comment